These rexrs often start with rhe complaint againsr rhe person accused of wirchcrafr (information) and rhejusrice of the Peaces examination of the accused (examination); the latter generally comprises rhe bulk of the pamphlet. At the end there is a brief note giving rhe fare ol rhe accused. In rhe 1 590s this structure changed ro one based on a rhird-person narration of rhe case, and this new partem would dominate in seventeenth-century England. In these later documents a moncler coats third-party — presiding judge, physician, moncler clothing or CHI Hair Straighteners even person aftiicred by the witch - often provided this commentary and, not surprisingly, often rreated rhe case more polemically and less procedurally. In both situations, however, witchcraft pam¬phlets were produced because there was public interest in these srories, an imporranr and sometimes slighted element in the composition and dissemination of moncler published witchcraft cases. Printers appreciated rhe cases' commercial potential and were quite willing to enhance ir. In fact, printers themselves apparently hired individuals ro copy these documents; woodcuts were produced to illustrate the highpoinrs ot the CHI flat iron case, frequently the witch's execution; and distinctive lettering marked key CHI Hair Straightener points in the text. The commercial and promotional aspects of later Tudor pamphlets arc even more apparent, given rhar individuals involved in the case may have written them (Gibson 1999: 118—39). The participant's role in dissemination can be striking, as in that of Richard Galis who wrote A Brief Treatise Contemning the Most Strange and Horrible Crueltye of Elizabeth Stile (1579) because he could nor get his local Berkshire magis¬trates ro believe that witches were attacking him (Gibson 2003: xi). The Mary Glover moncler jackes litigation of 1602-3 inspired a slew of pamphlets arguing tor the medical, not magical, roots of her illness and tor rhe efficacy of prayer in ridding her other demons, all written by, or with the direct input of, someone involved in her bewitchment. Providing shocking accounts of witchcraft used in attempts to kill the king of Scotland, Neuts front Scotland found an audience throughout England.The need ro conrcxrualizc sources about the sixteenth-century English and Scottish witchcraft trials has led scholars to focus increasingly on rhe legal structures and processes of these trials themselves. In both England and Scotland witches could be trial before both secular and church courts, but their distinct legal systems and dif¬ferent levels of centralizarion led to divergent trial processes. In England rhe secular courts were rarely involved in witchcraft rrials until rhe 1 542 witchc raft statute; from this stage, however, they came moncler jackets ro dominate rhe proceedings.
Commentaires
Il n'y a aucun commentaire sur cet article.